It seems that one Senator is finally seeing the light when it comes to the tax credits being made available to first time home buyers.
When the idea of first time homebuyer tax credits was first being discussed, a proposal was made in the U. S. Senate that the credit be as much as $15,000. As the bill made its way through the process the amount was reduced to $8,000 and was signed into law.
I remember saying, as the debate was taking place that, although I thought the housing market market should be allowed to correct itself without government interference, if the government was going to ”stimulate” anything is should be housing. After all isn’t everyone saying that the housing bubble is responsible for the terrible economy. Why are we putting trillions of dollars in places that have nothing to do with housing?
If the government thinks these credits are worthwhile (over the long term I am not so sure) we need to make them available to ALL homebuyers, the credit needs to be much larger than $8,000, and buyers should be able to use the credit in lieu of down payment monies.
Two things have now happened since the program went into effect. 1. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has determined that the credit can be used instantly as part of an increased down payment and/or for buyers closing costs. 2. Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA) has introduced a bill to increase the credit to $15,000 and make the credit available to ALL homebuyers.
Again, although I am generally opposed to government interference in the free market, if it is going to happen it should be a bigger proposal than it is. My proposal would be to make the credit 10% of the purchase price of the home with a cap of $50,000. Because this program is going to artifically improve home prices over the short term (the goverment is paying buyers to buy homes), it will be necessary to ween us ofr the program over a longer period of time than just one year in order to keep home prices from falling off a cliff when the program is terminated. I propose to put this program in place for a 5 year period and begin phasing out the credit after the first 2 years.
The truth is that the market will correct itself without all these credits and will be stronger for it. But Senator Isakson and I feel the same way; If you are going to do it make sure it will get the job done.
It is nice to know that, on this, I am not alone